Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Michael Bramer wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 1998 at 12:32:19PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Michael Bramer wrote:
> > > I have possibly a solution:
> > >
> > > We don't make a new CD-set. The next CD-set is Debian slink aka Debian 2.1.
> > > Now we make only a 'patch-CD' from hamm-unstable.
> > We're not speaking about a new cd set. Well, some of us are referring
> > to a new set of official cd image. My concern was and still is release
> > numbering, revision numbering. Regardless of the official cd image set.
> Yes, I know.
> CD-set=set of cd-images
> I write the sentence once more:
> We don't make new cd images. The next cd-images is Debian slink aka Debian
> 2.1. Now we make only a 'patch-CD-image' from hamm-unstable.
This doesn't resolve the naming problem in any way.
This just avoids new official cd images.
This doesn't avoid cd vendors using the newest snapshot for making
their own cd.
Unable to locate coffee, operator halted. -- Stefan Farsch