[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: SSH v2 [intent to package]

On Thu, Aug 27, 1998 at 08:17:43AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> Guy Maor <maor@ece.utexas.edu> wrote:
> > I think you should package this as ssh2, but continue to package
> > version 1 as well.  They can conflict.  If it's too much work to
> > package both, then just stay with 1.
> I really cannot be bothered.  I'm not sure the licence even allows me to run 
> it for testing purposes, before releasing the package, so I'm not going to be 
> able to use it.
> If someone else wants to package it, I'll certainly help them to make the two 
> packages as compatible as possible.

	I'm going to do this - I'm the weird situation where
	on the other hand I can't use ssh2 for my business and
	on the other hand have a proper license for the commercial

	Note, I hate the license. However I have people who
	really want it for compability with Windows SSH v2
	(it allows scp from win).
	I will package it as ssh2, make it provide /usr/sbin/ssh2d
	etc, and the user can change the symlinks (/usr/bin/ssh) to
	choose which version to use. That's the upstream solution..
tv-nospam-sig-1@hq.yok.utu.fi - it's a valid address w/o spam

Reply to: