Re: SSH v2 License --- much less free than v1

[Guy Maor <maor@ece.utexas.edu>]

Philip Hands <phil@hands.com> writes:

> Having read the license (which I attach bellow), I'm not inclined to package
> it, since I really cannot see many people being able to use it.

I think you should package this as ssh2, but continue to package
version 1 as well.  They can conflict.  If it's too much work to
package both, then just stay with 1.

> I'm also not certain that we are allowed to distribute it in binary form.

I don't see anything which indicates that.


Guy