Re: SSH v2 License --- much less free than v1
Philip Hands <email@example.com> writes:
> Having read the license (which I attach bellow), I'm not inclined to package
> it, since I really cannot see many people being able to use it.
I think you should package this as ssh2, but continue to package
version 1 as well. They can conflict. If it's too much work to
package both, then just stay with 1.
> I'm also not certain that we are allowed to distribute it in binary form.
I don't see anything which indicates that.