Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
>>"Steve" == Steve Lamb <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
Steve> On Wed, Aug 26, 1998 at 02:21:37PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
>> Steve Lamb <email@example.com> wrote:
>> > In short, deception.
Steve> How so? As I've repeatedly stated, if someone asks for the
Steve> latest version and gets a previous one is that not deception?
If what you say were anywhere close to what were happening,
you would be right. However, the latest release is 2.0.
Steve> My priorities are where everyone's priorities in this project
Steve> are, where they understand problems. That is the whole point
Steve> of having 2-300 people going over that. In the KDE issue I
Steve> have no clue why it is illegal for KDE (GPL'd) to link to QT
Steve> when Trolltech's FAQ says it is ok. To me the Debian Social
Steve> Contract contradicts itself (No restrictions on code yet GPL
Steve> code is restricted to be released under the GPL). Since I
Steve> don't clearly grasp those or they aren't worth my time
Steve> fighting over (I don't like or use KDE, so to hell with it) I
Steve> choose to focus my energies elsewhere.
I see. You have consstently misunderstood the Debian project,
and the licensing and freedom of software issues dear to the heart of
the project. And now suddenly you know better than everyone (apart
from liw, no one seems to side with you, really) what is good for the
As in the cases you point out, I think you have, again, missed
The speed of anything depends on the flow of everything.
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E