Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
On Wed, 26 Aug 1998 15:25:47 -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
>> How so? As I've repeatedly stated, if someone asks for the latest
>> version and gets a previous one is that not deception?
>It's the same version of debian.
But not the same revision. It is not the latest release.
>Anyways, what about next week's security fix? Or the one that
>comes in next month?
That isn't the issue. The issue is vendors not being able to rotate the
stock fast enough so now we're going to do a song and dance with the
numbering scheme to extend the shelf life of their stock.
>Yeah, that means you weren't paying attention.
No, it means that I don't give a crap about KDE or what is linked to it.
I don't use it, I don't care about it.
>If you care, I've filed bug reports against all the kde packages
>where I noticed this happening. That doesn't mean I found all
>of them [and I have reason to believe that I didn't].
Bully for you.
>Too bad you haven't a clue what you're talking about. You're great
>at rhetoric.
Neither do you. I jumped in on this issue because people were talking
about making concessions to venders because they over ordered stock. What's
your point with security?
--
Steve C. Lamb | Opinions expressed by me are not my
http://www.calweb.com/~morpheus | employer's. They hired me for my
ICQ: 5107343 | skills and labor, not my opinions!
---------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reply to: