Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
On Mon, 24 Aug 1998, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Nils Lohner wrote:
> > >Yes I fail to see the diffrentence between 2.0.1 and 2.0 r1 too, dosn't
> > >solve any problems at all.
There isn't really a _problem_, it just perception the of the average
user. Personally, I dislike letters in version numbers, but thats IMO
So, having said that, should it not be 2.0 r2, since it is the second 2.0
release? Again, for the sake of the average user.
> reach users. The distribution is already too big to be installed
> over 28k8.
Another reason my old 14.4 is better then a 28.8 :)
cd
===================================================================
| | Chris Davis |
| cdavis@cois.on.ca | Computer Engineering OTO+1 |
| | University of Toronto |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| Developer, Linux port to the Sparc/Sun4 Architecture. |
| Powered by Debian GNU/Linux. www.debian.org www.linux.org |
|=================================================================|
| PGP Key #B823A045 available from pgp keyservers |
| fingerprint = 22 88 13 91 6B A7 34 14 76 56 0C 35 D8 E5 06 20 |
|=================================================================|
| "Together we will rule the world, |
| all by myself" |
===================================================================
Reply to: