Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
Nils Lohner wrote:
> >Yes I fail to see the diffrentence between 2.0.1 and 2.0 r1 too, dosn't
> >solve any problems at all.
> It's not a real difference, it's a perceived difference. 2.0 r1 seems to
> be just another release of 2.0, where 2.0.1 seems to imply more significant
> changes since the version number itself changed. Yes, they do basically
> mean the same, but in the commercial (marketing) world it makes a difference.
Which is the reason why the decision was made not to increase the
version number anymore. We can't ignore CD vendors if we want to
reach users. The distribution is already too big to be installed
If you come from outside of Finland, you live in wrong country.
-- motd of irc.funet.fi