Re: Support for xinetd
Martin Schulze <joey@kuolema.Infodrom.North.DE> wrote:
> what's the current state of this? I know that some peope wanted to
> provide an update-inetd program that works for xinetd together with
> two conversion routines.
>
> When are they going to appear?
I have about a third of the update-inetd program written. I'm
stalled right now, because of the lack of abstraction in the
underlying program, and because I'm suddenly more busy.
The right approach, I think, is to define some kind of abstraction
and declare buggy any programs that don't qualify. But like I said
I'm kinda busy at the moment.
If anyone wants to pick up the effort, I can ship them a copy of
what I've done so far (or I will if I can figure out where I left
it -- it's not where I thought I'd left it .. bleah).
--
Raul
Reply to: