Re: Can we do without non-free?
On Thu, Aug 20, 1998 at 09:02:16AM +0100, Joop Stakenborg wrote:
> > Those who don't want to work on non-free are welcome not to. There are
> > packages in non-free that have no counterpart in main.
> Here is my point: we want to distribute FREE software. Why do we need to have
> a non-free section? What packages from non-free do we really need?
Which parts get into the distribution?
--
Steve C. Lamb | Opinions expressed by me are not my
http://www.calweb.com/~morpheus | employer's. They hired me for my
CC: from news not wanted or appreciated| skills and labor, not my opinions!
---------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reply to: