Hi, Santiago Vila schrieb am 06. August 1998: > My point is: We whould not wait for the first case to happen! I don't really like the sitation. At the momenta I am very upset to Santiago. He first made a bugreport about the unsubscription of himself. He is actually one of two persons where this happened afaik. On the contrary are ~8000 subscribers to 55 Lists where most of them don't have problems. That is the first aspect. Second: There was a bugreport, going to listmaster. Because this was a bug which is caused on smartlist (and other things), we closed the bug. Btw: Santiago is the smartlist-maintainer, so he is responsible. Anyway, we (Joey and me as listmasters) discussed this topic with Santiago. You can read the mails in the bugreport itself. We closed the discussion with some kind of agreement - every side wanted to improve the situation. But now he started the discussion here - where it doesn't belong to. The first time I saw the subject I was just ready to give up. To stop being listmaster. If someone agrees to stop a discussion you should do that - and not transfer it to a place where it doesn't belong to. Why have you made that? Only for security reasons? Then fix smartlist. It is _your_ package we're running the list on. I will soon install the latest smartlist package. Maybe the bugs will be fixed in it. I don't think I will follow the discussion. It is a bugreport, nothing more, nothing less. That should be all. I don't ssee the point putting it into debian-devel. Ciao, Hanno, one of listmaster@lists.debian.org -- | Hanno Wagner | Member of the HTML Writers Guild | Rince@IRC | | Eine gewerbliche Nutzung meiner Email-Adressen ist nicht gestattet! | | 74 a3 53 cc 0b 19 - we did it! | Generation @ | Famous last word: [X] »Man liest sich« und *PLONK* gehören nicht in dieselbe Nachricht. Carsten Teske
Attachment:
pgpelVZ5oFYsd.pgp
Description: PGP signature