[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: POSIX shell; bash ash pdksh & /bin/sh



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Thu, 6 Aug 1998, Raul Miller wrote:

> I agree that bash is less than a perfect implementation of /bin/sh,
> 
> I agree that it would be nice to have a standard and allow any shell
> which meets that standard be /bin/sh,
> 
> I agree that the backwards compatibility problem can be licked: it
> is possible to migrate from our current configuration to one where
> bash is but one possibility of many.
> 
> I do NOT agree that we're ready to do that yet.

And nobody agrees that we are ready to do that yet, Raul.

I will repeat: We are talking (see my very first post) for the day there
is a proven and well tested alternative to /bin/sh.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1

iQCVAgUBNcl8XCqK7IlOjMLFAQEAKQP+MLMgVQdKFCBkGU99zikOlk5A6dPlq9TQ
cvfrgk0AvSt5oGfD9aCESc7cRI8NePWEi5OPpRhVEXw/5xYd2QRu3z0clRiSmToN
3GNbH2O1Cyd08lKKKxRu2Qq0Nvw2BpvLq/wHm+eq4amDOWL2nNaxhAI7h8++jwSK
E3DMuK08rOs=
=5Vos
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org


Reply to: