Re: POSIX shell\; bash ash pdksh \& /bin/sh
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com> wrote:
>
> Then you are indeed missing on the fact that people have been
> using bash in packages and private scripts since bash has indeed been
> named essential.
I am NOT arguing for making bash nonessential or anything like that. But I
think private scripts is not a valid argument for the status quo since they
will only break if their admins removed the bash package and I don't think
that's anymore likely than someone who runs perl scripts and removing perl.
--
Debian GNU/Linux 2.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: