[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Upgrading to hamm



	No there were no modutils.dpkg* after the upgrade, strange, since modules was not a symlink, it was
the actual file...

On Wed, Aug 05, 1998 at 01:15:33PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> Quoting Javier Fdz-Sanguino Pen~a (jfs@ieeesb.etsit.upm.es):
> > 	The problem is, in Debian 1.3 the script /etc/init.d/boot would call
> > the script to do this, and would allow either /etc/init.d/modutils or
> > /etc/init.d/modules. But in hamm, the script is run like any other script in
> > /etc/init.d by a symlink in /etc/rcS.d, the point is the symlink was made to
> > /etc/init.d/modutils NOT /etc/init.d/modules, and modutils was NOT provided
> > by the packages (whomever they are :)
> 
> On my bo system, the modutils package has /etc/init.d/modutils as a conf
> file and /etc/init.d/modules as a link to /etc/init.d/modutils. What I
> don't understand is what happened to your original
> /etc/init.d/modutils--that's why I asked about it. Was there a
> /etc/init.d/modutils.dpkg-* after your hamm upgrade?
> 
> -- 
> Michael Stone, Sysadmin, ITRI     PGP: key 1024/76556F95 from mit keyserver,
> mstone@itri.loyola.edu            finger, or email with "Subject: get pgp key" 
> 
> 
> --  
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org


Reply to: