Re: Upgrading to hamm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Wed, 5 Aug 1998, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> Later, when I checked /etc/ it was filled with files name .dpkg-dist
> or .dpkg-new. That's ok since I had the chance to compare one by one and
> choose to overwrite the older or not.
> The problem is, many were the SAME (???) a 'diff file
> file.dpkg-dist' returned nothing, so I had to delete by hand all the
> .dpkg-dist that were nothing new.
Probably (I'm just wondering) they were not conffiles yet in Debian 1.3.1,
but they should have been. I don't know what dpkg does when a certain
conffile was not still a conffile in the previous package version, but it
should be easy to check.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
iQCVAgUBNch0uiqK7IlOjMLFAQH2ygQAkhbDOupwKX9+YK12Hm9fg1VkLA6Y4rUG
k96tNoSB/FgMDw/A1B2O8FJHHJhOnnUFmpRMMiUQRkb3keom9D0fLa9gozxHfr33
kS1FQeqzcHwvancH3MHpcAgHV0xvKSIPWEse7X+mpfDMEhubt5wBQ5hZqYX6l0OS
eyuWaECVDpQ=
=2ui3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: