Re: POSIX shell; bash ash pdksh & /bin/sh
On Mon, Aug 03, 1998 at 10:03:20AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Santiago" == Santiago Vila <email@example.com> writes:
> Santiago> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Santiago> On Sun, 2 Aug 1998, Raul Miller wrote:
> >> Santiago Vila <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> >> > I will explain better: I don't want to remove bash, I just want that
> >> > the unability to remove it comes from the fact that packages depends
> >> > on it, not from the fact that it is simply essential.
> >> Ok, but: what's the rush?
> Santiago> Exactly, why do you think there is any rush at all on my
> Santiago> side? I think I said "in the long term" in one of my first
> Santiago> posts about this.
> I still don't think we can report bugs against packages merely
> for using bash.
I dunno...I think as it stands maybe "wishlist" wouldn't be improper
/* -- Stephen Carpenter <email@example.com> --- <firstname.lastname@example.org>------------ */
E-mail "Bumper Stickers":
"A FREE America or a Drug-Free America: You can't have both!"
"honk if you Love Linux"
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org