[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: POSIX shell; bash ash pdksh & /bin/sh



Hi,
>>"Shaleh" == Shaleh  <shaleh@livenet.net> writes:

 Shaleh> Manoj, I think you missed the point of his post originally.
 Shaleh> It was not "bash is bad, kill bash".  Rather that he and
 Shaleh> others prefer to set bin/sh to point to something else.  This
 Shaleh> apparently broke some scripts for him.

 Shaleh> His question was why are we calling /bin/sh yet using
 Shaleh> bash-isms.  Joey has said that in the policy manual this is
 Shaleh> listed as a bug.  So if one finds a bash script calling
 Shaleh> /bin/sh we should file a bug.

 Shaleh> Bash is not going away, understood and agreed.  However,
 Shaleh> developers need to realize that bash is not the only possible
 Shaleh> sh.  And that is the point he is trying to make.


	If this is indeed the brunt of this thread, I missed it
 completely. I do apologize. I fully agree with Shaleh's message; we
 should not have bashisms in scripts invi=oked with /bin/sh.

	manoj
-- 
 "You can call Usenet a democracy if you want to.  You can call it a
 totalitarian dictatorship run by space aliens and the ghost of
 Elvis. It doesn't matter either way." Dave Mack
Manoj Srivastava  <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org


Reply to: