Re: Archive Restructuring - Package Pool
Hi,
>>"Marcelo" == Marcelo E Magallon <mmagallo@efis.ucr.ac.cr> writes:
Marcelo> [ Manoj, do you want this on debian-policy or debian-devel?
Marcelo> The ammount of crossposting lately is making those lists
Marcelo> even harder to read ]
If I have to choose, I would say this is to determine policy;
and should be moved to the policy list. Once we have settled down, we
can again ask the general body in -devel to look at the result.
Setting Followup-To to debian-policy@lists.debian.org
>> 4) When there are no (non wishlist?) bug reports reported, and the
>> package is rellease ready in the maintainers mind, the maintainer
>> tags it as such and asks that it be moved to the staging
>> area. (suggest a minimum bug free stay in unstable before this is
>> done?)
Marcelo> I'm not sure I'm following you here... stable (hamm) was
Marcelo> released with bugs. Are you aiming at some
Marcelo> super-stable/bug-free OS? Hamm is amazingly stable (at so is
Marcelo> slink, at this point -- mind the sed bug, for example)
Well, yes, that was wishful thinking. I think important and
higher bugs should not exist when moving a package to the staging
area.
manoj
--
It won't be covered in the book. The source code has to be useful
for something, after all... :-) --Larry Wall in
<10160@jpl-devvax.JPL.NASA.GOV>
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: