Re: Why has bo vanished from the archives?
On Wed, Jul 29, 1998 at 01:54:12PM -0500, servis@purdue.edu wrote:
> I understand the fact that there is a stable->hamm and unstable->slink.
> But why can't the bo directory still be around without anything
> symlinked to it. By removing bo we are basically slamming the door on
> all the users who are unable to upgrade to hamm and still might need to
> get a package from bo. Sid is on the archives and it does not have a
> link to it, why not bo? If there needs to be a link besides the code
> name it could be linked from something like 'old' or 'previous' or
> 'unsupported' or whatever.
I removed bo from my mirror (llug.sep.bnl.gov) due to disk space.
Tim
--
(work) sailer@bnl.gov / (home) tps@buoy.com - http://www.buoy.com/~tps
"Everything's better when wet."
Steve Miller - "Jungle Love"
** Disclaimer: My views/comments/beliefs, as strange as they are, are my own.**
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: