[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Why has bo vanished from the archives?



On Wed, Jul 29, 1998 at 01:54:12PM -0500, servis@purdue.edu wrote:
> I understand the fact that there is a stable->hamm and unstable->slink.
> But why can't the bo directory still be around without anything
> symlinked to it.  By removing bo we are basically slamming the door on
> all the users who are unable to upgrade to hamm and still might need to
> get a package from bo.  Sid is on the archives and it does not have a
> link to it, why not bo?  If there needs to be a link besides the code
> name it could be linked from something like 'old' or 'previous' or
> 'unsupported' or whatever. 

I removed bo from my mirror (llug.sep.bnl.gov) due to disk space.

Tim

-- 
 (work) sailer@bnl.gov / (home) tps@buoy.com - http://www.buoy.com/~tps
                      "Everything's better when wet."
   Steve Miller - "Jungle Love"
** Disclaimer: My views/comments/beliefs, as strange as they are, are my own.**


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org


Reply to: