Re: debian 2.3 name
On Tue, 28 Jul 1998, Joseph Carter wrote:
> 2.2, gnome, FHS, possible ftp site restructure, multiple boot image support
> on install media which will fit it (ie, multi-floppy images on CD-ROM or on
> zip disk (which I'm working on myself) or similar), possible LSB and unix98
> compliance with it, possible GGI which is coming together quickly now, maybe
> even devfs in the kernel? Then of course there are ideas being talked about
> like multi-machine installations, linuxconfig/coas or something better
> inspired by both, the death of smail as an "important package" and
> replacement at least exim if vmailer isn't stable .....
if all of this was attempted, it would be suicide. it would never ever get
done (maybe). it would take forever. it should be done gradually. and that
makes me wonder how we'll ever get to 3.0 ;)
> I know what harmony is, qtk is another free qt? thing is, what does it
> matter if the KDE people don't want to use a free qt? RIght now they have a
qtk is more of a wrapper for qt through gtk. really wierd. off the top of
my head, http://sunsite.unc.edu/freetds/qtk-something.tar.gz is the url.
see the gnome-list archives for more info.
justin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: