Re: debian 2.3 name
>
>
> On Tue, 28 Jul 1998, Joseph Carter wrote:
>
> > 2.2, gnome, FHS, possible ftp site restructure, multiple boot image support
> > on install media which will fit it (ie, multi-floppy images on CD-ROM or on
> > zip disk (which I'm working on myself) or similar), possible LSB and unix98
> > compliance with it, possible GGI which is coming together quickly now, maybe
> > even devfs in the kernel? Then of course there are ideas being talked about
> > like multi-machine installations, linuxconfig/coas or something better
> > inspired by both, the death of smail as an "important package" and
> > replacement at least exim if vmailer isn't stable .....
>
> if all of this was attempted, it would be suicide. it would never ever get
> done (maybe). it would take forever. it should be done gradually. and that
> makes me wonder how we'll ever get to 3.0 ;)
I think that's why the above are really "Debian Goals", and the only
"release-critical slink goals" are 1) get it out the door in 3-4
months, and 2) make it easy-upgrade-compatable with hamm.
--
Buddha Buck bmbuck@acsu.buffalo.edu
"Just as the strength of the Internet is chaos, so the strength of our
liberty depends upon the chaos and cacaphony of the unfettered speech
the First Amendment protects." -- A.L.A. v. U.S. Dept. of Justice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: