Re^2: Should we ship KDE in hamm?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re^2: Should we ship KDE in hamm?
From: Marco.Budde@hqsys.antar.com (Marco Budde)
Date: 22 Jul 98 20:02:00 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 432_9807230757@antares.antar.com>
In-reply-to: [🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.980722120959.19086B-100000@ilary.keycomm.it

Am 22.07.98 schrieb dalla # pluto.linux.it ...

Moin Michele!

MDS> I don't like to have software non-opensrc in the main distribution or
MDS> official CDROMs.

But KDE is free software.

MDS> Good if it go in non-free section (not contrib!). If KDE will be
MDS> removed from hamm, no problem for me.

For me it#s no problem, too, but a lot of our users like KDE. We shouldn#t  
remove it.

MDS> If there are so many problem with copyright and license, why not move
MDS> all the KDE packages to non-free?

There#re no real problems.

MDS> I use Debian because it is ALL software Open Source.

But most users don#t think so!

cu, Marco

--
Uni: Budde@tu-harburg.de           Fido: 2:240/5202.15
Mailbox: mbudde@hqsys.antar.com    http://www.tu-harburg.de/~semb2204/


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Re^2: Should we ship KDE in hamm?
  - From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com>
- Re: Re^2: Should we ship KDE in hamm?
  - From: Martin Schulze <joey@kuolema.Infodrom.North.DE>
- Re: Re^2: Should we ship KDE in hamm?
  - From: Philip Hands <phil@hands.com>
- Betraying our Social Contract (was: Should we ship KDE in hamm?)
  - From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>

Prev by Date: Re^2: CD images
Next by Date: Re: RH and GNOME
Previous by thread: Re: Re^2: CD images
Next by thread: Re: Re^2: Should we ship KDE in hamm?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread