Re: dpkg is not a dead project (was Re: RH and GNOME)
On Wed, Jul 22, 1998 at 06:02:03PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> On Wed, 22 Jul 1998, Enrique Zanardi wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 22, 1998 at 04:31:02AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > dpkg is indeed not a dead project.
> >
> > I would love to have the dpkg_1.4.1.* series in slink to make that
^^^^^
> > obvious.
> >
> > Does anyone know why people is working on the 1.4.0.* series for slink,
^^^^^
> > instead of moving to the "development" series?
>
> Maybe because the development series are somewhat broken?
That's a reason for working on the 1.4.1.* series! If it's broken we must
fix it.
> Maybe because hamm had to be released with a stable dpkg?
hamm? Which hamm? I don't see any hamm in my message.
Santiago, I'm talking about slink! >;-P
--
Enrique Zanardi ezanardi@ull.es
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: