Re: dpkg is not a dead project (was Re: RH and GNOME)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Thu, 23 Jul 1998, Enrique Zanardi wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 1998 at 06:02:03PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 Jul 1998, Enrique Zanardi wrote:
> >
> > > Does anyone know why people is working on the 1.4.0.* series for slink,
> > > instead of moving to the "development" series?
> >
> > Maybe because the development series are somewhat broken?
>
> That's a reason for working on the 1.4.1.* series! If it's broken we must
> fix it.
>
> > Maybe because hamm had to be released with a stable dpkg?
>
> hamm? Which hamm? I don't see any hamm in my message.
Oops! sorry. Maybe people working on 1.4.0.x in slink expected to move it
to "hamm-fixed" some day? I don't know.
I agree with you. Someone should work on the 1.4.1.x series before
it diverges from the 1.4.0.x series too much.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
iQCVAgUBNbcDcCqK7IlOjMLFAQFACgQAsJInXbz9IKNp1aenPknBvUGPvhnO890L
UwtY+gtfBvQBZrT09oDK6DT3DNNHTeWq4AtPM5b455EbE+2WP/L2GSJNwcuAp/cH
+sIiOtNT2W7mkxcVU/agpAhv00wRF8I8Ypb+2WjLnKn7FWv9TlQ68uqChF1Gy0HU
zZTsIYl7hVM=
=XFlj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: