Re: dpkg is not a dead project (was Re: RH and GNOME)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Wed, 22 Jul 1998, Enrique Zanardi wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 1998 at 04:31:02AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > dpkg is indeed not a dead project.
>
> I would love to have the dpkg_1.4.1.* series in slink to make that
> obvious.
>
> Does anyone know why people is working on the 1.4.0.* series for slink,
> instead of moving to the "development" series?
Maybe because the development series are somewhat broken?
[ Do you remember the recent horror story about dpkg 1.4.1.x when Marcus
tried to port it to GNU/Hurd? ].
Maybe because hamm had to be released with a stable dpkg?
(Just wondering).
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
iQCVAgUBNbYM9SqK7IlOjMLFAQHt4gQApipkToTG0l+hcHjWqr4ldzmAZKEoiFDR
lEUo6GNgUmFqURRruP6urQoJn7/vvjacqw2X3N6hhaOf5wqJ27ddVlz1xDKOYEQM
F3SEoLWGc6Wv8RQsraDnd0ufch3AIwuxXPDvhO4PiTxrfshLR9FWYOXELRFzZt6w
bxWVBg7ErYI=
=5pB+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: