Re: Should we ship KDE in hamm?

To: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
Cc: Debian Development <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Should we ship KDE in hamm?
From: Martin Schulze <joey@kuolema.Infodrom.North.DE>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 09:06:09 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 19980722090609.A398@kuolema.Infodrom.North.DE>
Reply-to: Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.north.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 19980722030442.48324@test.legislate.com>; from Raul Miller on Wed, Jul 22, 1998 at 03:04:42AM -0400
References: <[🔎] 4851.900944063@hands.com> <[🔎] m0yysio-001MxwC@finlandia.Infodrom.North.DE> <[🔎] 19980722030442.48324@test.legislate.com>

Raul Miller wrote:

> I don't think we 't have to pull things off the ftp site, yet, but we
> should at least include a comment about the situation in our release
> notes.

Seconded.

> And we definitely shouldn't have any such packages on our official
> cdroms.

Not seconded unless there are severe copyright issues.

Regards,

	Joey

-- 
Computers are not intelligent.  They only think they are.


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Should we ship KDE in hamm?
  - From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>

References:
- Re: Should we ship KDE in hamm?
  - From: Philip Hands <phil@hands.com>
- Re: Should we ship KDE in hamm?
  - From: joey@finlandia.infodrom.north.de (Martin Schulze)
- Re: Should we ship KDE in hamm?
  - From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Should we ship KDE in hamm?
Next by Date: Re: Should we ship KDE in hamm?
Previous by thread: Re: Should we ship KDE in hamm?
Next by thread: Re: Should we ship KDE in hamm?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread