Re: RH and GNOME
Shaleh <shaleh@livenet.net> writes:
> Raul Miller wrote:
> > Shaleh <shaleh@livenet.net> wrote:
> > > He refuses to accept any changes to the Makefile or config scripts to
> > > allow installation in anything but /usr/local/enlightenment.
> >
> > I was under the impression that some other guy was working on a complete
> > overhaul of the config stuff, including the ability to configure gets
> > run from.
> >
> > You mmight want to talk with him about when that will be ready, or how
> > you can help (I forget his name, but think he posted a couple times to
> > the enlightenment list).
>
> Raul I have talked to both Raster and Mandrake in person and in irc.
> They say that it is theirs and they will do what they darn well please.
> Both of them want all of E to be in <foo>/enlightenment -- bins,
> configs, dox, everything.
That's unfortunate. I would, however, like to look at your patches.
One way that would satisfy both groups would be:
- Put the following line early in E/configure.in, and all subdir
configure.ins too:
ac_default_prefix=/opt/enlightenment
- People who just do
./configure; make; make install
will get their stuff in
/opt/enlightenment/{bin,doc}
- People who explicitly specify a prefix as in
./configure --prefix=/my/own/place
./configure --prefix=/usr
would still get the right stuff, according to the GNU FS layout, and
most probably FSSTND too.
(Of course, this may be exactly what your patch does. Since I haven't
seen it yet...)
- Hari
--
Raja R Harinath ------------------------------ harinath@cs.umn.edu
"When all else fails, read the instructions." -- Cahn's Axiom
"Our policy is, when in doubt, do the right thing." -- Roy L Ash
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: