Re: Upcoming Debian 2.0 Release
> > nonus.debian.org 23642 Packages [28] (Heiko Schlittermann <heiko@datom.de>)
>
> Why do we worry about the nonus problems as release-critical bugs?
I'm a bit torn on that issue. This bug is specifically about the directory
structure, which really should be the same as the rest of the distribution.
> > infocom 23563 infocom: /usr/doc/infocom/copyright doesn't include a licence [30] (Brian White <bcwhite@pobox.com>)
>
> We have some more of these sort of bugs and we just downgraded them to
> normal. What is the difference here?
Beats me. I just moved it to non-free and closed it (since it was my pkg).
> > wu-ftpd-academ 24466 netstd: Upgrading netstd overrides wu-ftpd-academ entry in inetd.conf [0] (Heiko Schlittermann <heiko@lotte.sax.de>)
>
> Please don't miss this one. This is an essential part of the
> distribution. Would be very bad publicity if we leave it out.
Yup. I've already moved it to the "keeper" list.
> > Hamm has been delayed for too long already. Let's get this done.
>
> I perfectly agree with this one. Do it.
Brian
( bcwhite@verisim.com )
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diplomacy is the art of saying "nice doggy!"... until you can find a rock.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: