On Wed, Jul 15, 1998 at 12:36:43AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote: > I've been a little occupied with CD images etc recently, and qmail's licence > tends to bump it a couple of notches down my priority list, but I think I > will be able to comply with DJB's var-qmail conditions, and thus produce a > real actual qmail binary deb Real Soon Now (tm). Of course it will result > in a package that seriously violates our file system layout, but who cares, > it's non-free anyway ;-) I do for one.. => I'm pretty sure the symlink tree is close enough if it's there. I can already see the "This package is not {FSSTND,FHS} compliant" bug. =p > As far as qmail for default MTA goes, I really cannot see Dan changing his > mind about the problems with his (lack of) licence, so don't expect to see > qmail in main any time soon --- therefore, it won't be our default MTA. <sigh> If you really don't think so, I won't bother trying.. =p I still think qmail is a better MTA than smail period and better than sendmail for a small system or one in which you cannot afford to lose mail. > As for trying gentle persuasion with Dan, it's probably best to leave him > alone. He is fully aware of the issues as we see them, but happens to look at > things differently. > > I would suggest people just agree to differ with him on that one, since he'll > only make you angry otherwise, and that's not good for the soul (yours or his). > > On a positive note, the addition of the var-qmail stuff to the distribution > permissions appears to be a concession of sorts, on his part, to accommodate > the needs of distributors, so even if qmail never becomes free enough to be > allowed into Debian proper (i.e. main), at least this should be enough for > some commercial vendors to dump sendmail as their default MTA. Problem is that many users are stuck with smail now because it's the default. Sendmail would be a better default, to say nothing of even exim or one of the other MTAs that I've heard of recently. I -STILL- wonder if ssmtp+fetchmail+procmail is not be best way to handle mail on a dialup box personally. Qmail's setup is almost idiotproof, but the above would require nothing you couldn't do in postinst if the postinst knew that you'd be doing that..
Attachment:
pgp_J7pwfqPaC.pgp
Description: PGP signature