Re: Problems with javalex
In message <19980704192653.A24084@kuolema.Infodrom.North.DE>,
Martin Schulze writes:
>Is there any reason for not taking over the package *now*? I don't speak
>Java, I don't wan to maintain it. I only want to have it *working* as a
>completely non-working package is a thorn in the eye.
>Anyway, now that it works I'll be the interim maintainer for this package.
>I *do* want somebody else maintain it. I'll assign myself as maintainer
>in order to get it maintained again and to really fix the bugs on this
>package. Please consider taking over this one. The only thing that's
>still missing is the manpage, as far as I can see.
Okay, I'll take it. I'll try to make an upload sometime soon.
I had been trying to stay away from JDK, because of the "clean room"
clause in Sun's licences. I don't suppose it'll hurt to -use- it,
though, just so long as I keep well away from the source code...
White pages entry, with PGP key: <URL:http://alethea.ukc.ac.uk/wp?95cpb4>
PGP public keyprint: 74 68 AB 2E 1C 60 22 94 B8 21 2D 01 DE 66 13 E2
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org