Re: The XDM trap

To: servis@purdue.edu, cas@taz.net.au
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: The XDM trap
From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 1998 20:52:16 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 19980708205216.D786@test.legislate.com>
Mail-followup-to: servis@purdue.edu, cas@taz.net.au, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 35a3f6ed727c002@herald.cc.purdue.edu>; from servis@purdue.edu on Wed, Jul 08, 1998 at 05:52:20PM -0500
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.980708133252.27513L-100000@siva.taz.net.au> <[🔎] 35a3f6ed727c002@herald.cc.purdue.edu>

servis@purdue.edu <servis@purdue.edu> wrote:
> You are probably right since this is what is run on the local
> machine.  But if modifying the X wrapper to stop xdm is not possible
> then /etc/X11/xdm/Xreset_0 seems to be the best place.

Actually, Xreset_0 is a better place to do it.  X is used by
xinit, but Xreset_0 is only used by xdm.

-- 
Raul


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: The XDM trap
  - From: Jeff Sheinberg <jeffsh@erols.com>

References:
- Re: The XDM trap
  - From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
- Re: The XDM trap
  - From: servis@purdue.edu

Prev by Date: Mail Loop???
Next by Date: Re: libc6_2.0.7r-3 considered harmful
Previous by thread: Re: The XDM trap
Next by thread: Re: The XDM trap
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread