[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libc6_2.0.7r-3 considered harmful

[Moving this discussion to -policy, please remove -devel from headers if
following up]

[The issue here is whether the archives should automatically keep backups,
in case of harmful upgrades like the recent libc6]

--On Mon, Jul 6, 1998 4:49 pm +1000 "Herbert Xu"
<herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote: 

> In article <Pine.LNX.3.96.980705233522.180A-100000@dwarf.polaris.net> you
>> While I agree, the current management of the archives makes this quite
>> difficult, as there isn't sufficient archive space to keep every old
>> version of every package, which is the only way to be "absolutely" safe.
> I'm not sure if I need old deb files but I have always wanted an archive
of old
> diff files though.

It seems to me that the appropriate answer is just this - to keep diff
files, which should be much smaller.

And possibly the archive either needs orig.tar.gz, or it needs a URL from
which it can retrieve it (this is a possible candidate for a field in the
.dsc file - URL to retrieve upstream source).  Then automated scripts on the
archive could rebuild old versions if required.



|  Jelibean aka  | jules@jellybean.co.uk         |  6 Evelyn Rd        |
|  Jules aka     | jules@debian.org              |  Richmond, Surrey   |
|  Julian Bean   | jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk        |  TW9 2TF *UK*       |
|  Debian GNU/Linux - "Microsoft *does* have a year 2000 problem -     |
|                      and we're it!" (paraphrased from IRC)           |

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to: