Re: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Hello,
I just got two of these messages after filing two bug reports against
xfstt. I'd think somebody's mail setup is wrong.
On Sat, 4 Jul 1998, Mail Delivery System wrote:
> This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
>
> A message that you sent could not be delivered to all of its recipients. The
> following address(es) failed:
>
> sjc@Shit-Box.carpanet:
> generated |procmail
>
> The following text was generated during the delivery attempt:
>
> ------ |procmail ------
>
> procmail: Lock failure on "/var/spool/mail/sjc.lock"
>
> ------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
>
> Return-path: <remco@Cal011205.student.utwente.nl>
> Received: from shit-box.carpanet [10.0.0.42] (sjc)
> by Shit-Box.carpanet with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #1 (Debian))
> id 0ysUT8-00012b-00; Sat, 4 Jul 1998 11:43:18 -0400
> Received: from mail.gis.net
> by Shit-Box.carpanet (fetchmail-4.3.9 POP3)
> for <sjc/Shit-Box.carpanet> (single-drop); Sat, 04 Jul 1998 11:43:18 EDT
> Received: from bos1d.delphi.com (SYSTEM@bos1d.delphi.com [199.93.4.4]) by home.gis.net (8.8.8/8.8.8+djf) with ESMTP id JAA21923 for <sjc@gis.net>; Sat, 4 Jul 1998 09:29:50 -0400 (EDT)
> Received: from delphi.com by delphi.com (PMDF V5.1-8 #23839)
> id <01IYZXM516C292BFT1@delphi.com> for sjc@gis.net; Sat,
> 4 Jul 1998 09:28:21 EDT
> Received: from master.debian.org ("port 13539"@[205.229.104.5])
> by delphi.com (PMDF V5.1-8 #23839)
> with SMTP id <01IYZW74UVTC92CDZ9@delphi.com> for sjc@delphi.com; Sat,
> 04 Jul 1998 08:47:19 -0400 (EDT)
> Received: (qmail 8940 invoked by uid 1211); Sat, 04 Jul 1998 12:47:11 +0000
> Received: (qmail 8936 invoked from network); Sat, 04 Jul 1998 12:47:11 +0000
> Received: from debian.novare.net (HELO submailer.bugs.debian.org)
> (iwj@205.229.104.5) by debian.novare.net with SMTP; Sat,
> 04 Jul 1998 12:47:11 +0000
> Received: by submailer.bugs.debian.org id m0ysRGU-001sDBC
> (Debian /\oo/\ Smail3.1.29.1 #29.35); Sat, 04 Jul 1998 07:18 -0500 (CDT)
> Received: via spool by bugs@bugs.debian.org id=B.8995544398049 (code B ref -1)
> ; Sat, 04 Jul 1998 12:18:01 +0000 (GMT)
> Resent-date: Sat, 04 Jul 1998 09:28:21 -0400 (EDT)
> Resent-date: Sat, 04 Jul 1998 12:18:01 +0000 (GMT)
> Date: Sat, 04 Jul 1998 14:13:56 +0200 (NST)
> Resent-from: Remco Blaakmeer <remco@Cal011205.student.utwente.nl>
> From: Remco Blaakmeer <remco@Cal011205.student.utwente.nl>
> Subject: Bug#24237: /etc/init.d/xfstt is not a conffile
> Resent-sender: iwj@debian.org
> Resent-to: sjc@gis.net
> Resent-to: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
> To: Debian Bug System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
> Resent-cc: sjc@debian.org (Stephen J. Carpenter)
> Reply-to: Remco Blaakmeer <remco@Cal011205.student.utwente.nl>,
> 24237@bugs.debian.org
> Resent-message-id: <handler.24237.B.8995544398049@bugs.debian.org>
> Message-id:
> <Pine.LNX.3.96.980704140736.10997A-100000@blaakmeer.student.utwente.nl>
> X-VMS-To: IN%"submit@bugs.debian.org" "Debian Bug System"
> MIME-version: 1.0
> Delivered-to: sjc@debian.org
> X-Debian-PR-Message: report 24237
> X-Debian-PR-Package: xfstt
> X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
> X-UIDL: e53f4e01a97b98b960596c5f991b0ac0
>
> Package: xfstt
> Version: 0.9.9-1
>
> Today I noticed that /etc/init.d/xfstt is not a conffile. I had made some
> local changes to this file and noticed they were gone without warning
> after an upgrade.
>
> All files in /etc/init.d/ (and generally, all files under /etc that are
> not modified by scripts) should be conffiles, as mandated by Policy.
>
> Remco
>
>
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: