Re: Debian Free Software (FSF) or Open Source? (was Re; non-cd...)
Nathan E Norman wrote:
>
> On Sat, 27 Jun 1998, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
>
> [ snip ]
>
> Huh? First you say:
>
> : > > With the new Open Source movement I think it is time to reexamine your
> : > > true mission. If you want to create a pure GNU system than continue
> : > > what you are doing. However if you want to have an active role in the
> : > > Open Source movement--that Linus supports--than I see the debain
> : > > philosophy as a major roadblock if kept unchanged. Chances are more
> : > > major linux programs will use free (but not free to debian standards) to
> : > > accularate development.
>
> Then after being duly chastised :) you say:
>
> : Ok the policy is good as a standard setting mile stone but not for
> : creating the best distribution which is freely available.
>
> So what exactly is your complaint? You seem to think that Debian should
> use the Open Source Guidelines to build a distribution, but then you say
> that those same guidelines are not suitable for creating said
> distribution.
>
> I've completely no idea what your complaint is.
My complaint is that I think that Debian should keep that guideline to
identify to people what is truly free but should adopt a slightly less
strict guideline to be able to include stuff like Qt, KDE and Mysql into
the official distributions.
>
> IMO, Debian is the best distribution I've ever used (and I've done
> Slackware, RedHat, and Caldera).
>
And I agree. I want to make it better by allowing some not so free
programs in the main distribution mainly Qt for the movement.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: