Re: emacs -> emacs19. Why?

To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca>
Cc: Steve Dunham <dunham@cse.msu.edu>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: emacs -> emacs19. Why?
From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 1998 20:29:25 -0400 (EDT)
Message-id: <[🔎] 13717.36453.916751.238480@miles.econ.queensu.ca>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.980627163705.4928R-100000@Wakko.ualberta.ca>
References: <[🔎] m9bg1gq7cmr.fsf@fatneck.cps.msu.edu> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.980627163705.4928R-100000@Wakko.ualberta.ca>

  Jason> If adpkg is as dangerous as people say then we should remove it from
  Jason> experimental. 

Seconded.

It's Chris Lameter himself who complained a million times about lacking dpkg
development. He should have remove adpkg a long time ago ... due to lack of
support for adpkg. After all, the package is dated Feb '97.

-- 
mailto:edd@debian.org              According to the latest official figures, 
http://rosebud.ml.org/~edd      43% of all statistics are totally worthless.


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Re: emacs -> emacs19. Why?
  - From: Steve Dunham <dunham@cse.msu.edu>
- Re: emacs -> emacs19. Why?
  - From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca>

Prev by Date: Re: Having a non-free and a non-cd branch?
Next by Date: Re: [rms@santafe.edu: Hurd packager]
Previous by thread: Re: emacs -> emacs19. Why?
Next by thread: Re: emacs -> emacs19. Why?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread