Re: emacs -> emacs19. Why?
On Sat, Jun 27, 1998 at 04:42:26PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> If adpkg is as dangerous as people say then we should remove it from
> experimental. Personally I wouldn't even use experimental with APT till it
> gets a correctly formed packages file, that includes all packages and has
> an Architecture field.
>
> As far as APT guessing replaces, it doesn't.
Actually, using experimental in a sources.list is a VERY bad idea.
You'll get gcc 2.8.1, which on Intel can not even compile a working
kernel. While not as bad, that's still a tad difficult to reverse.
Dan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: