[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libc6_2.0.7 release notes...

--On Tue, Jun 23, 1998 2:59 pm -0400 "Raul Miller" <rdm@test.legislate.com>

>> Anyway, this is obviously somewhat of a religious issue, and having
>> said that I whole heartedly agree with Manoj (that there are *zero*
>> technical arguments against epochs), I will now shut up and ignore
>> this thread.
> I believe the scope issue constitutes a technical argument.

[Cc to policy added]

I personally feel that the scope issue is a minor, aesthetic, but valid,
technical argument.

My personal suggested scheme would be:


Or some such (I haven't got the bit of policy handy which specifies exactly
which characters I can use), since it includes the full upstream version,
but sorts correctly.


|  Jelibean aka  | jules@jellybean.co.uk         |  6 Evelyn Rd        |
|  Jules aka     |                               |  Richmond, Surrey   |
|  Julian Bean   | jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk        |  TW9 2TF *UK*       |
|  War doesn't demonstrate who's right... just who's left.             |
|  When privacy is outlawed... only the outlaws have privacy.          |

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to: