Re: Bug#23742: emacs19 should probably be just "emacs"
On Tue, Jun 23, 1998 at 11:39:31AM +0200, Santiago Vila Doncel wrote:
> Is anybody able to do a brief summary, please? If "emacs" is abolished as
> a virtual package name, what is the point in forbidding a package to name
> itself as emacs?
Because we cannot banish it for all time past.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt, hamish@debian.org, hamish@rising.com.au, hmoffatt@mail.com
Latest Debian packages at ftp://ftp.rising.com.au/pub/hamish. PGP#EFA6B9D5
CCs of replies from mailing lists are welcome. http://hamish.home.ml.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: