Re: Bug#23742: emacs19 should probably be just "emacs"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 21 Jun 1998, Mark W. Eichin wrote:
> Perhaps you could review the discussion 6 months ago (or more!) when
> we first concluded that this was the *only* way it would work...
Is anybody able to do a brief summary, please? If "emacs" is abolished as
a virtual package name, what is the point in forbidding a package to name
itself as emacs?
> Users *will* get somewhat confused. Then again, that's because they
> don't read the release notes, or perhaps don't run autoup which I
> think handles this gracefully.
Users should not be forced to use any particular upgrade method.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
iQCVAgUBNY93oSqK7IlOjMLFAQFc9AP+ILrYcHwP+N0LLzkEA8ReV/I1VHbtuKmJ
+Zj2pdZ5LC5OJ4/s2F1zb6Qi5kRoQTHqzJ9V6UYTE3Z/Qi2d/x+gcgpqf1zJAtaH
S8To9zN5ME4lmM1b5iTrOtGScQ7smFm0G3plH+XdBt1lCVtxhXhG11p2Iy4Ir73o
IqRQyQze6/o=
=YXSb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: