Intent to do SOMETHING with: p2c
My personal opinion on this is that p2c in it's current state should be
removed from hamm. It's completely broken, as it depends on a non-existant
package that was removed from hamm during the freeze because, of all things,
a lintian error:
* #19382: libp2c1: ldconfig-symlink-missing-for-shlib LI#117
Package: libp2c1; Severity: important; Reported by: firstname.lastname@example.org; 98 days old.
However, something usable should go in slink. (p2c is still used by the
occasional person, I had someone ask me on #debian where libp2c1 was...).
Whatever happens, I'm not a good person to maintain p2c. I'm not so sure
*anyone* is - are there *any* developers that use it?
I plan to do a quick NMU of 1.20-2.4 for unstable that gets us back to using
libp2c.a instead of .so.
Robert Woodcock - email@example.com
"Unix and C are the ultimate computer viruses" -- Richard Gabriel
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com