Re: Intent to do SOMETHING with: p2c
Robert Woodcock wrote:
> My personal opinion on this is that p2c in it's current state should be
> removed from hamm. It's completely broken, as it depends on a non-existant
> package that was removed from hamm during the freeze because, of all things,
> a lintian error:
>
> * #19382: libp2c1: ldconfig-symlink-missing-for-shlib LI#117
> Package: libp2c1; Severity: important; Reported by: schwarz@debian.novare.net; 98 days old.
Why don't you try to fix the library? If all that's wrong with it is a
missing symlink, that should be easy enoujgh to fix.
--
see shy jo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: