Re: Packages Removed from Hamm (!)
Brian White <email@example.com> writes:
> I don't think it's a good idea to include new patches at this late
> of a date. There's too great of a chance of new bugs being
> introduced with no time to evaluate them, let alone fix them.
Well, without the patches, at least on my system, scsidev just
segfaults when run. It's *completely* useless. It has obvious buffer
overrun problems, so it can't really be doing the "right thing" on any
system. I'm not sure I completely fixed the problem, but I'm pretty
certain I didn't make it worse.
Rob Browning <firstname.lastname@example.org>
PGP fingerprint = E8 0E 0D 04 F5 21 A0 94 53 2B 97 F5 D6 4E 39 30
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org