Re: Packages Removed from Hamm (!)
Brian White <email@example.com> writes:
> Just because it isn't in Hamm doesn't mean it isn't available, too.
> For those who need it, which I guess would be only the occasional person,
> it will still be available in "unstable".
> Do you think it is acceptable to just point those who need it to
> "unstable"? If so, then I wouldn't worry about it.
This sounds fine. When I think about it, the number of people
affected is probably pretty small, so just forget I complained...
Rob Browning <firstname.lastname@example.org>
PGP fingerprint = E8 0E 0D 04 F5 21 A0 94 53 2B 97 F5 D6 4E 39 30
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org