Re: Packages to be removed from hamm
On Fri, May 29, 1998 at 08:25:07PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 1998 at 10:22:30AM -0700, David Welton wrote:
> > ircii 21683 ircii: ircii is non-free!  (Bernd Eckenfels <email@example.com>)
> > tkirc depends on ircii
> > In addition to these two packages, bitchx and epic should also be
> > removed.
> *sigh* This really suxx.
Yes, especcially because, according to the past maintainers of ircII,
*no one* has ever intended that this stuff not be free. I think that
in light of this, a little leeway could be given while efforts are
under way to resolve this.
> > Debian-policy also is not free, as it contains the fsstnd. As has
> > been noted elsewhere, parts of perl-doc are not free.
> Debian policy is non-free? Oh dear! Now this gets rediculous. Does
> ne1 object against splitting debian-policy into debian-policy and fsstnd?
Should we be doing that this late in the game?
Let's "throw momma from the train" (err... get the release out:-) and
deal with this stuff for 2.1.
David Welton http://www.efn.org/~davidw
Debian GNU/Linux - www.debian.org
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com