[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: New APT version

>>"Brederlow" == Brederlow  <goswin.brederlow@student.uni-tuebingen.de> writes:

 Brederlow> Because its hard (a lot of work) to tell what directories
 Brederlow> will on different devices and which will never be on
 Brederlow> different devices,

	Not nerely hard, impossible. You can try and guess
 probabilities, but I think going from 3 levels to 5 levels changes
 the total size of the resulting data by an insignificant amount.

 Brederlow> its probably a good idea to include a
 Brederlow> du tree for say the first 3 directory levels
 Brederlow> /usr/X11R6/lib but not further. 4 or 5 might be a saver
 Brederlow> value, but that could be made the reponsibility of the
 Brederlow> maintainer. Theres no need to define that it must be
 Brederlow> 3. Any depth should be handled correctly.



 A morsel of genuine history is a thing so rare as to be always
 valuable. Thomas Jefferson
Manoj Srivastava  <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to: