Re: upstreams maintainer conflict, was: wget: remove outdated manual page

[Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr>]

Nicolás Lichtmaier <nick@feedback.net.ar> writes:

> >     2) The maintainer has presented the excuse that since removing
> >        the manpage leads to a bug in the package, it shouldn't be
> >        done.  My statement was pointing out that the fact that the
> >        manpage is out of date is a bug in any case, so the package
> >        has at least one bug whether or not the manpage is removed,
> >        and that shouldn't be a consideration.  He can deal with a
> >        bug about a removed or inadequate manpage, or he can deal
> >        with a bug about an outdated manpage, but either way it's a
> >        bug, and it needs to be fixed, preferably by providing an
> >        accurate, up-to-date manpage based upon the current info
> >        documentation.
> > 
> 
> I'm glad to see that you agree with me on all this. It's just that
> you don't know the facts.

Which facts are those?  Perhaps I don't know the facts either.  Why
don't you educate us by providing them, for a change.

-- 
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Sauron is alive in Argentina!


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org