Re: hamm
Kenneth.Scharf@coulter.com writes:
> Trying to upgrade via FTP to hamm would be too painfull at 28.8KB!
Hi,
It depends on your pain threshold, I guess. I thought that too,
until I started the bo testihng program a little over a year ago.
Since then I have updated from rex to bo, then bo to hamm, and am
maintaining a hamm and slink mirror (i386 binary only), all over a
28.8 link.
Bob
--
_
|_) _ |_ Robert D. Hilliard <hilliard@flinet.com>
|_) (_) |_) Palm City, FL USA PGP Key ID: A8E40EB9
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: hamm
- From: "James R. Van Zandt" <jrv@vanzandt.mv.com>
- References:
- hamm
- From: Kenneth.Scharf@coulter.com