Re: Intent to package pine-src

To: Debian Developers <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Intent to package pine-src
From: James Troup <J.J.Troup@scm.brad.ac.uk>
Date: 01 May 1998 19:01:53 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] dmmyawldg4u.fsf@dcsun4.comp.brad.ac.uk>
In-reply-to: Raul Miller's message of "Fri, 1 May 1998 13:45:40 -0400"
References: <19980430225443.B1190@test.legislate.com> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.980501125612.756A-100000@dwarf.polaris.net> <[🔎] 19980501131828.Q1819@test.legislate.com> <[🔎] dmm90olew7p.fsf@dcsun4.comp.brad.ac.uk> <[🔎] 19980501134540.S1819@test.legislate.com>

Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com> writes:

> More specifically, I don't think that late in the frozen stage is
> the right time to introduce a new package format requirement for
> hamm.

Nor do I, which is why I've been avoiding this discussion.

-- 
James


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Intent to package pine-src
  - From: Dale Scheetz <dwarf@polaris.net>
- Re: Intent to package pine-src
  - From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
- Re: Intent to package pine-src
  - From: James Troup <J.J.Troup@scm.brad.ac.uk>
- Re: Intent to package pine-src
  - From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>

Prev by Date: Re: List of bugs that *must* be fixed before releasing Hamm
Next by Date: Re: Intent to package pine-src
Previous by thread: Re: Intent to package pine-src
Next by thread: Re: Intent to package pine-src
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread