Re: bzip2 for source packages?
Michael Alan Dorman <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> James Troup <J.J.Troup@scm.brad.ac.uk> writes:
> > Michael Alan Dorman <email@example.com> writes:
> > > Might I suggest that using it for source packaging would be
> > > appropriate, though?
> > By recompressing things in bzip2, you lose the ability to use pristine
> > upstream source (since the vast majority of source stills comes in
> > .tar.gz form).
> That's a good point, one I hadn't thought of.
What about pristine upstream sources that use bzip2?
They aren't common, but I already seen some sources as bzip2.
> > Having said that, I'm a lot less opposed to this idea than I am to the
> > idea of using bzip2 for debs.
> Well, perhaps it would be nice to have it as an option for things
> where either we can't use pristine source anyway, or those rare, but
> often meaningful, occasions where it's supported upstream (linux
> kernel, maybe xfree one day...).
> Besides, considering the glacial pace of dpkg development, you won't
> have to take a decided stance any time soon. :-)
If gzip is made to recognise bzip2 it wouldnt need any change in any
other programm. The dpkg would directly work with it.
May the Source be with you.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com