Re: Only m68k and i386 in hamm?
On Tue, Apr 28, 1998 at 02:23:12AM -0700, Guy Maor wrote:
> Martin Schulze <joey@kuolema.Infodrom.North.DE> writes:
>
> > As far as I can see we only have disadvantages supporting
> > hamm-powerpc. (no regular uploads, extra handling of security
> > fixes to non-supported versions, frozen of _really unstable_
> > binary set etc.)
>
> I would make dinstall just throw all uploads for it to slink and
> ignore hamm. That way porters don't have to worry that the package
> says "frozen unstable".
Sounds good.
Regards,
Joey
--
/ Martin Schulze * joey@infodrom.north.de * 26129 Oldenburg /
/ The good thing about standards is /
/ that there are so many to choose from. -- Andrew S. Tanenbaum /
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: