Re: Only m68k and i386 in hamm?
Martin Schulze <joey@kuolema.Infodrom.North.DE> writes:
> As far as I can see we only have disadvantages supporting
> hamm-powerpc. (no regular uploads, extra handling of security
> fixes to non-supported versions, frozen of _really unstable_
> binary set etc.)
I would make dinstall just throw all uploads for it to slink and
ignore hamm. That way porters don't have to worry that the package
says "frozen unstable".
Guy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: